SaintJamesApostle, on 27 December 2010 - 04:05 AM, said:
- integration with a svn client and Visual Studio to update arcemu
- integration with sourceforge to submit issues.
Otherwise it will be just another manager like allothers.
I don't agree with this actually ( I'd probably get 200 -rep for this, but then again I don't care if people like me
Can you for example rebuild the kernel, or any of the server daemons with webmin? How about the Windows manager consoles?
A manager console / application is what it is, it's for managing the server. Starting / Stopping, configuring, maybe monitoring their health. He already has more than that, like adding/removing items, which is not really a manager application's job, but w/e.
Is this really an issue if there are more of these? Everyone can choose their flavor, just like with Windows Managers in Linux, there are people who prefer GNOME, and there are who prefer KDE and there are who prefer some other. I don't see a problem with this...
As for submitting issues. What if it's used with a custom server or a repack? Are you volunteering to tell these apart? Don't we have enough to do as is while being totally understaffed?
Although it also depends on what issues you want submitted. Do you want the issues that were reported using the feedback addon? We might as well change Arcemu then to submit those issues automatically.
( NOTE: I thought about this, when implementing the feedback addon's server side code and the sample Feedback PHP application. I did not implement such automatic submission system for a GOOD REASON ).